0.7 seconds per move, where GPT-6 Astra was slow.
Paul Wei had GPT-6 Astra play Slay the Spire 2 before: capable, but slow. With Jev each move took 0.7 seconds, faster than he could follow on screen. The post is in Chinese.
A company called TypeSafe AI launched a model this week called Jev. They told us how fast it is. They told us what it costs. They told us it plays Doom in a tenth of a second.…
medium.com · Games & real time
medium.com
Resource
Games & real time
-
-
TypeSafe’s Jev Makes ... Decisions Fast Enough to Play Doom | by Kristopher Dunham | Sep, 2026 | Medium ... # TypeSafe’s Jev Makes AI Decisions Fast Enough to Play Doom ... A…
medium.com · Games & real time
medium.com
Resource
Games & real time
-
-
🧵 I wanted to understand what makes Jev different from a normal LLM. So I built a tiny real-time game with it. The AI controls the player and has one goal: Don't get hit.
@abolbuild · Games & real time
@abolbuild
X post
Games & real time
-
-
To pick that list better, I tried Jev, a decision model from TypeSafe. I did not have Jev write recommendations. I asked it to rate candidate games, then handed the model that…
dev.to · Games & real time
dev.to
Resource
Games & real time
-
-
昨天出的 typesafe.ai Jev 模型 适合高频决策，那岂不又是适合打游戏？ 之前用 GPT-6 Astra 代打杀戮尖塔2 能力强但速度慢。 我刚实测用 Jev 打，行动思考只需 0.7秒， 画面我都没看清它就操作完了。 这超人类游戏速度， 着实又让我震惊瘫坐了😅 语言很难描述这感觉，看视频⬇️
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x
